<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Differences Between Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 Bankruptcy</title> <atom:link href="http://splendidresources.com/article/differences-between-chapter-7-and-chapter-13-bankruptcy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://splendidresources.com/article/differences-between-chapter-7-and-chapter-13-bankruptcy/</link> <description>Splendid Resources to Guide You</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:27:23 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: phinck</title><link>http://splendidresources.com/article/differences-between-chapter-7-and-chapter-13-bankruptcy/comment-page-1/#comment-6520</link> <dc:creator>phinck</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 05:46:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://splendidresources.com/article/differences-between-chapter-7-and-chapter-13-bankruptcy/#comment-6520</guid> <description>Minnesota mines produce the most iron, followed by Michigan.  World wide Brazil produces the most iron, followed by Australia.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Minnesota mines produce the most iron, followed by Michigan.  World wide Brazil produces the most iron, followed by Australia.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: stou</title><link>http://splendidresources.com/article/differences-between-chapter-7-and-chapter-13-bankruptcy/comment-page-1/#comment-4883</link> <dc:creator>stou</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 14:52:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://splendidresources.com/article/differences-between-chapter-7-and-chapter-13-bankruptcy/#comment-4883</guid> <description>arr hell nah, not the dad ! always the decent ones that get killed first, damn.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>arr hell nah, not the dad ! always the decent ones that get killed first, damn.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: coop kashikin</title><link>http://splendidresources.com/article/differences-between-chapter-7-and-chapter-13-bankruptcy/comment-page-1/#comment-4466</link> <dc:creator>coop kashikin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 18:46:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://splendidresources.com/article/differences-between-chapter-7-and-chapter-13-bankruptcy/#comment-4466</guid> <description>Who receive abortions in the United States? That&#039;s the question asked by the Guttmacher Institute in a just-released survey. While the demographics remain similar in most respects since the last study in 2000 — a majority of women (61%) who get abortions are already mothers; young, black, and Hispanic women are disproportionately represented — one change really stuck out. In 2000, 27% of abortion patients were poor women, whereas in 2008, that number had risen to 42%. Quite a jump. What caused the leap? On a positive note, efforts within the reproductive health movement to provide abortion procedures on sliding scale fees and subsidized by donations increased accessibility. However, the big reasons seem to be the impact of the recession in deterring women from having children and a 25% increase in women in poverty from 2000-2008. The study concludes: &quot;Rather than restricting access to abortion, policy efforts could accomplish more by increasing access to a broad array of reproductive...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who receive abortions in the United States? That&#8217;s the question asked by the Guttmacher Institute in a just-released survey. While the demographics remain similar in most respects since the last study in 2000 — a majority of women (61%) who get abortions are already mothers; young, black, and Hispanic women are disproportionately represented — one change really stuck out. In 2000, 27% of abortion patients were poor women, whereas in 2008, that number had risen to 42%. Quite a jump. What caused the leap? On a positive note, efforts within the reproductive health movement to provide abortion procedures on sliding scale fees and subsidized by donations increased accessibility. However, the big reasons seem to be the impact of the recession in deterring women from having children and a 25% increase in women in poverty from 2000-2008. The study concludes: &#8220;Rather than restricting access to abortion, policy efforts could accomplish more by increasing access to a broad array of reproductive&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
